We stress the hostile environment with which we have been experiencing moments before the Extraordinary General Meeting. We have no doubt that hostile environment was promoted by the leaders of La Seda, gave us the impression that our President Mr. Morlanes sack dress from her closet and forgot a trade unionist who is the President of all shareholders, including those belonging United Association for silk.
In the lobby of a hotel where the Board held there was a small demonstration of workforce assets and liabilities La Seda, where banners were UGT and CCOO A friend of United for La Seda approached them to offer some leaves which we explained our position to the Board and he answered him to get the papers "of the party saved." They made it clear that we were not pleasing to them.
We denounce that "someone playing dirty" was responsible for disseminating to the United Association for La Seda went to the Board with the sole intention to boycott and that the Board did not take place and put us as the "bad guys 'and solely responsible for the failure of the feasibility of silk and mounted the demonstration in front of the Hotel was a fact obvious that foul play had been successful.
We also note the silence information we received most of the press. Only two media turned to us in the previous Board, El Economista and La Gaceta de los Negocios. At the AGM in August, barely knew we had a much better treatment by the press. We do not understand this change of attitude and more taking into account that as of August were barred from entering the joint. We think it may have something to do after the call that gave them the day before Mr. Morlanes.
also want to denounce and this is what we personally know Mr. Fontcuberta, not allow enter the Board to delegate some shareholders who had their votes in our association. Mr. Fontcuberta told us that no card could not enter we had to meet standards. But upon entering the room we could see were a number of people over fifty, who had come with "invitation" and who were not shareholders, but employees and supporters of Mr. Morlanes. Do not denounce these people were invited to enter, but if you are inviting people who are not shareholders but employees are also not in the invitation to shareholders as a punishment for being represented in the United Association for The Silk Road. Mr. Morlanes
we do not have enjoyed their ways and foul play that has been used with us, we do not agree with you and knows it, but even cockney attitude gives us more reasons to ratify it in that you do not deserve to be President Silk.
will send an official letter to Mr. Morlanes expressing all these complaints.
other hand though we lost the vote, as expected, directly tell you that the Association had more than 13,000,000 shares delegates, and MUTUAL Fiatt also voted against the bills, it annoyed him a lot to Mr. Morlanes it and not only voted against a group of shareholders mad and pissed off but a reference shareholder when they signed these Mr Castell had accounts as Vice Chairman.
That means that it now recognizes that disagrees with the accounts that once signed.
We believe this change has been because we now have data that did not have before. The
specific topic of votes we will send another announcement as soon as we prepared
0 comments:
Post a Comment